From TeleSUR: "Food Shipment Destined For Venezuela Seized Due to US Blockade"

By -



The ship was seized in the Panama canal according to the Venezuela government. 



Venezuela’s Vicepresident Delcy Rodriguez denounced Wednesday that a ship containing 25 thousand tons
of soy-made products has been seized in the Panama Canal due to the U.S. blockade while calling
on the United Nations to take action against the "serious aggression" that impede Venezuela "right to food".
"Venezuela denounces before the world
that a boat that holds 25 thousand tons
of tons of soy, for food production in our
country, has been seized in the Panama
Canal, due to the criminal blockade
imposed by Donald Trump," the vice
president said in a tweet. 
"Venezuela calls on the UN to stop this serious aggression by DonaldTrump's govt against
our country, which constitutes a massive violation of the human rights of the entire
Venezuelan people, by attempting to impede their right to food."
In a subsequent tweet, the Venezuelan senior official explained that the owner of the vessel
carrying the merchandise of food was informed by the insurance company that it was
prevented from moving that cargo to Venezuela.
The shipment seizure comes just days after Trump signed an executive order Monday
that imposes a near-total blockade on government assets in that country, which includes an
 embargo against food suppliers, among other basic inputs. This is the first time in 30 years
that Washington has taken such an action against a sovereign country.
https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Food-Shipment-Destined-For-Venezuela-Seized-Due-to-US-Blockade-20190807-0012.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Deforestation Process

By -
Image
  The Deforestation Process Deforestation is too often reduced to what’s most conspicuous. But deforestation is complex and a lot more than raising beef cattle or growing soybeans. To begin with, despite all the biodiversity especially of plant life, rain forest soil isn’t very fertile. Nope, it’s actually very oxalic. Oxalic soils are acidic. Acidic soils are full of iron, bauxite and other minerals.  So not only are trees in the forest chopped down for their precious hardwood, the soils these trees grow in are mined for minerals including aluminum, zinc, copper, manganese, gold and iron. Do you know where the aluminum in your water bottle came from? What’s one of most electricity intensive things to do? Convert bauxite into aluminum. It’s an electrostatic process to remove oxygen from the alumina (Al2O3). This electricity is also one of the largest costs of producing aluminum. So that’s why hydroelectricity is often used to reduce the costs of refining bauxite to alumina to ...
Read more

The Deep State vs The Deep Country

By -
Image
  The Deep State vs The Deep Country I need to begin with the obvious: in spite of all the deep state, propaganda and “deep empire” (transnational) resources being used to declare that “Biden” (i.e. Harris) has won, as of right now nobody knows who got most votes and where. I would even suggest that we will never really find out who won, because who won depends on a large number of local laws and regulations and because it will probably never be possible to separate the fake votes from the legal ones. Finally, neither side will ever gracefully admit to having lost the contest. So now the country will enter a profound crisis. That is the bad news. But there is also very good news. First, it has now become clear to the entire planet that the US “democracy” is anything but: the USA is an  oligarchic plutocracy , plagued with a myriad of antiquated laws and corrupt to the bone. The special “trick” of this US oligarchic plutocracy is that is masquerades as an ochlocracy: there is *...
Read more

Elections: A Trap for Fools. by Jean-Paul Sartre, 1973

By -
  First Published : Jean-Paul Sartre, «Élections, piège à cons»,   Les temps modernes , n° 318, janvier 1973; Source :  Good Morning, Revolution HTML Markup : for marxists.org by  Zdravko Saveski , 2021. In 1789 the vote was given to landowners. What this meant was that the vote had been given not to men but to their  real  estate, to bourgeois property, which could only vote for itself. Although the system was profoundly unfair, since it excluded the greater part of the French population, it was not absurd. The voters, of course, voted individually and in secret. This was in order to separate them from one another and allow only incidental connections between their votes. But all the voters were property owners and thus already isolated by their land, which closed around them and with its physical impenetrability kept out everything, including people. The ballots were discrete quantities that reflected only the separation of the voters. It was hoped that w...
Read more