AXIOMS OF DIVIDE AND CONQUER

By -

AXIOMS OF DIVIDE AND CONQUER

February 28, 2020 · by  · 
A society arranged in a minority/majority paradigm (ie, the Great Disparity) is always accompanied by divide and conquer.
A ruling class society is always in a state of divide and conquer.
Divide and conquer takes the heat off the ruling class.
The form and content of divide and conquer are determined by the Primal Divisions found in that society.
Whatever “diversity” exists in that society will become the basis for divide and conquer.
Divide and conquer turns natural allies (the masses) into enemies.
Divide and conquer is focused horizontally (contained to the masses).
Divide and conquer turns the masses into allies of the ruling class.
The herd is the best individual suited for divide and conquer.
The apathetic may or may not participate in divide and conquer.
The real person will see through divide and conquer.
The most effective divide and conquer is stoking the resentment of the “less privileged” against the “more privileged”. (note the quotation marks)
Conversely,
The “more privileged” develops fear of violence and chaos from the “less privileged”.
The more complaisant and contented society is, the less intense, prominent and wide spread the divide and conquer.
When a ruling class feels existentially threatened, the more intense, prominent and wide spread divide and conquer will be.
Intense divide and conquer will push the apathetic to become a herd individual or a real person.
Aggressive divide and conquer implies a breakdown in ruling class and establishment authority.
When divide and conquer fails, the establishment will move to more direct violence against the masses.
When divide and conquer fails, the masses will have overcome a ruling class obstacle.


https://therulingclassobserver.com/2020/02/28/axioms-of-divide-and-conquer/





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Deforestation Process

By -
Image
  The Deforestation Process Deforestation is too often reduced to what’s most conspicuous. But deforestation is complex and a lot more than raising beef cattle or growing soybeans. To begin with, despite all the biodiversity especially of plant life, rain forest soil isn’t very fertile. Nope, it’s actually very oxalic. Oxalic soils are acidic. Acidic soils are full of iron, bauxite and other minerals.  So not only are trees in the forest chopped down for their precious hardwood, the soils these trees grow in are mined for minerals including aluminum, zinc, copper, manganese, gold and iron. Do you know where the aluminum in your water bottle came from? What’s one of most electricity intensive things to do? Convert bauxite into aluminum. It’s an electrostatic process to remove oxygen from the alumina (Al2O3). This electricity is also one of the largest costs of producing aluminum. So that’s why hydroelectricity is often used to reduce the costs of refining bauxite to alumina to ...
Read more

The Deep State vs The Deep Country

By -
Image
  The Deep State vs The Deep Country I need to begin with the obvious: in spite of all the deep state, propaganda and “deep empire” (transnational) resources being used to declare that “Biden” (i.e. Harris) has won, as of right now nobody knows who got most votes and where. I would even suggest that we will never really find out who won, because who won depends on a large number of local laws and regulations and because it will probably never be possible to separate the fake votes from the legal ones. Finally, neither side will ever gracefully admit to having lost the contest. So now the country will enter a profound crisis. That is the bad news. But there is also very good news. First, it has now become clear to the entire planet that the US “democracy” is anything but: the USA is an  oligarchic plutocracy , plagued with a myriad of antiquated laws and corrupt to the bone. The special “trick” of this US oligarchic plutocracy is that is masquerades as an ochlocracy: there is *...
Read more

Elections: A Trap for Fools. by Jean-Paul Sartre, 1973

By -
  First Published : Jean-Paul Sartre, «Élections, piège à cons»,   Les temps modernes , n° 318, janvier 1973; Source :  Good Morning, Revolution HTML Markup : for marxists.org by  Zdravko Saveski , 2021. In 1789 the vote was given to landowners. What this meant was that the vote had been given not to men but to their  real  estate, to bourgeois property, which could only vote for itself. Although the system was profoundly unfair, since it excluded the greater part of the French population, it was not absurd. The voters, of course, voted individually and in secret. This was in order to separate them from one another and allow only incidental connections between their votes. But all the voters were property owners and thus already isolated by their land, which closed around them and with its physical impenetrability kept out everything, including people. The ballots were discrete quantities that reflected only the separation of the voters. It was hoped that w...
Read more