"How The FBI Created Domestic Terrorism: 80 Years Of Psychological Warfare Revealed" by Matthew Ehret
Thanks to voza0db for contributing this article.
How The FBI Created Domestic Terrorism: 80
Years Of Psychological Warfare Revealed
By Matthew Ehret On Jan
27, 2021
0 1,114
If, in the course of conducting this evaluation, we find that
terrorism is truly a “naturally occurring phenomenon”, then perhaps we might
conclude alongside many eminent figures of the intelligence
community and Big Tech, that new pre-emptive legislation targeting
the rise of a new conservative-minded domestic terrorist movement is somehow
necessary. Maybe the censoring of free speech, and the surveillance of millions
of Americans by the Five Eyes is a necessary evil for the sake of the greater
good.
However, if it is revealed that the thing we call “terrorism”,
is something other than a naturally occurring, self-organized phenomenon, but
rather something which only exists due to vast support from western political
agencies, then a very different conclusion must be arrived at which may be
disturbing for some.
But how to proceed?
Before it was revealed that ISIS was being supported by
a network of Anglo-American intelligence agencies and their allies in a failed effort
to overthrow Bashar al Assad, an exhaustive 2012 study was conducted by
the Center on National Security at
Fordham Law School. This study provides a convenient entry point to
our inquiry.
In this course of its investigation, researchers at Fordham
discovered that EVERY SINGLE ONE of the 138 terrorist incidents recorded in the
USA between 2001-2012 involved FBI informants who played leading roles in
planning out, supplying weapons, instructions and even recruiting Islamic
terrorists to carry out terrorist acts on U.S. soil. Reporting on the Fordham
study, The Nation reported on this scandal
stating:
“Nearly every major post-9/11 terrorism-related prosecution has
involved a sting operation, at the center of which is a government informant.
In these cases, the informants—who work for money or are seeking leniency on
criminal charges of their own—have crossed the line from merely observing
potential criminal behavior to encouraging and assisting people to participate
in plots that are largely scripted by the FBI itself. Under the FBI’s guiding
hand, the informants provide the weapons, suggest the targets and even initiate
the inflammatory political rhetoric that later elevates the charges to the
level of terrorism.”
Of course, this trend preceded 9/11 itself as we see in the case
of FBI informant Emad Salem (formerly associated with the Egyptian Military)
who recorded hundreds of hours of conversation between himself and his FBI
handlers which were reported publicly by the New York times on October
28, 1993. Why is this important? Because Emad Salem was the figure
who rented the van, hotel rooms, provided bomb-making instruction, tested out
explosives on behalf of Mohammed Salamah and 15 other terrorists who carried
out the February 1993 World Trade Center bombing which injured 1000 and killed
6 people.
Even though several large-scale military war game scenarios were
conducted between October 2000 and July 2001 featuring
planes flying into both the World Trade Center buildings and Pentagon, the
incoming Neocon administration were somehow caught with their pants down when
the events of 9/11 finally took place (conveniently at a moment that NORAD had
suffered a total breakdown of
their continental warning and response systems). When all flights were grounded
over the coming several days, Cheney and his PNAC cohorts ensured that the only
flights permitted to leave the USA was crammed with high level Saudi royals-
including the Bin Laden family.
Why was this done?
As the declassified 28 pages from
the 9/11 Commission report went far to demonstrate, the Saudis- largely
coordinated by Prince Bandar Bin Sultan (Saudi Ambassador to the USA from
1983-2005 and Bush family insider) had provided the foundation for a cover
story that was carefully scripted to justify the 9/11 incident.
Whether the plot was hatched by CIA-Saudi sponsored terrorists
as some assume, or whether it was a controlled demolition as hundreds of architects
and engineers have testified to (or whether it was a
combination of both stories), one thing is certain: The official narrative is a
lie and no matter how you try to explain it, two
airplanes cannot cause the collapse of three WTC buildings.
Another thing is certain: Biden was happy.
Not only did Joe Biden act as one of the most aggressive voices
for the invasion of Iraq in the days following 9/11, but he even bragged publicly that
John Ashcroft’s 2001 Patriot Act was modelled nearly verbatim
on his own failed 1994 Omnibus domestic surveillance legislation drafted in
response to the first 9/11 attack and 1994 Oklahoma City bombing.
Another important outcome of 9/11 involved the re-organization
of the FBI with a focus on domestic terrorist surveillance, prevention,
disruption and entrapment.
In 2001, MI5’s Chief came to the USA where then-FBI director
Robert Mueller was assigned the task of carrying out this new remix of U.S.
intelligence that involved re-activating many of the worst characteristics of
the FBI’s earlier COINTEL PRO operations that were made public during the 1974 Church Committee hearings.
A Christian Science Monitor report from May 19, 2004 cited
the changes in the following terms:
“They have done a number of things to move them in the direction
of an MI5,” says a person close to the changes. “They’ve created agents who are
trained to have an intelligence function. They’re monitoring organizations
within the U.S. that pose threats to national security … not with an eye toward
prosecuting, but toward collecting and analyzing that information.”
An incredible report by
investigative Journalist Edward Spannaus listed a short list of some of the
most extreme cases of FBI entrapment between 2001-2013 in the USA:
“One of the most egregious of these cases is the so-called
“Newburgh Four” in New York State, in which an informant in 2008-09 offered the
defendants $250,000, as well as weapons, to carry out a terrorist plot. The New
York University Center for Human Rights and Justice reviewed this case and two
others, and concluded: “The government’s informants introduced and aggressively
pushed ideas about violent jihad and, moreover, actually encouraged the
defendants to believe it was their duty to take action against the United
States.”
The Federal judge presiding over the Newburgh case, Colleen
McMahon, declared that it was “beyond question that the government created the
crime here,” and criticized the Bureau for sending informants “trolling among
the citizens of a troubled community, offering very poor people money if they
will play some role—any role—in criminal activity.”
In Portland, Ore., it was disclosed during the trial of the
“Christmas Tree bomber” earlier this year, that the FBI had actually produced
its own terrorist training video, which was shown to the defendant, depicting
men with covered faces shooting guns and setting off bombs using a cell phone
as a detonator. The FBI operative also traveled with the target to a remote
location where they detonated an actual bomb concealed in a backpack as a trial
run for the planned attack.
In Brooklyn, N.Y., in 2012, an FBI agent posing as an al-Qaeda
operative supplied a target with fake explosives for a 1,000-pound bomb, which
the FBI’s victim then attempted to detonate outside the Federal Reserve
building in Manhattan.
In Irvine, Calif., in 2007, an FBI informant was so blatant in
attempting to entrap members of the local Islamic Center into violent jihadi
actions, that the mosque went to court and got a restraining order against the
informant.
In Pittsburgh, Khalifa Ali al-Akili became so suspicious of two
“jihadi” FBI informants who were trying to recruit him to buy a gun and to go
to Pakistan for training, that he contacted both the London Guardian and the
Washington-based National Coalition to Protect Civil Freedoms, and told them
that he feared the FBI was trying to entrap him. The National Coalition
scheduled a press conference for March 16, 2012, at which al-Akili was to speak
and identify the informants, but the day before the scheduled press conference,
the FBI arrested al-Akili, charging him not with terrorism, but with illegal possession
of a firearm.
The chief informant trying to entrap al-Akili turned out to be
Shaden Hussain, a longtime FBI informant who had set up two earlier terrorism
cases: the above-cited Newburgh, N.Y., case for which he was paid $100,000, and
another in Albany, N.Y., for which his payments are not known.”
Not Only the USA
This post 9/11 practice was not isolated to the USA, as a Canadian appeals court overruled guilty
sentences handed down to an idiotic couple who were caught by the RCMP before
their July 2016 jihadi plot to bomb a public venue on Canada Day could occur.
Why did the appeals judge overrule their sentence? Because it became clear that
every single member of the operation which radicalized the young couple,
trained them to make bombs and even scripted their attack were RCMP informants!
Earlier cases of controlled domestic terrorist movements in
Canada saw CSIS (Canada’s Security and Intelligence Service) erase thousands of hours of wiretaps of Sikh terrorists that
detonated bombs in 1984 which lead to 329 dead in the worst act of aviation
terrorism until 9/11. Despite this destruction of evidence, CSIS was absolved
of its sins in 2005 by the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC). It
was also this same organization that was revealed to have co-founded the white supremacist
Heritage Front in 1988, and continued to finance it with tax
payer funds using CSIS agent Grant Bristol as the conduit and Heritage Front
controller until at least 1994.
Anglo-Canadian intelligence controls of domestic terrorism
actually go as far back as the bomb-loving Front de Liberation Quebec (FLQ) of
the 1960s that set dozens of mailbox bombs across the province. Not only did
the RCMP Security Services get caught
red handed managing FLQ cells, spreading FLQ graffiti on buildings
and even supplying explosives to
the group itself, but the FLQ’s “intellectual leader” (Pierre Vallieres) was also the Editor-in-Chief
of the very same magazine (Cite Libre)
which was run for a decade by none other than Canada’s Prime Minister Pierre
Elliot Trudeau!
When major press agencies blew the whistle on the federal intelligence agencies behind the FLQ which justified months of Martial Law in Quebec in 1970, Trudeau’s right hand man (and fellow Cite Libre writer) Michael Pitfield created a new organization called the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) in 1983 as a branch of the Privy Council Office in order to continue psychological operations going under a new name.
If anyone wishes to look through the voluminous RCMP/CSIS files accumulated on Pierre Trudeau’s strange connections with the FLQ and broader Fabian Society networks during the Cold War, they would be out of luck as historians were informed in 2019 that the entire Trudeau record archive were secretly destroyed by CSIS in 1989 simply because they “weren’t interesting”.
It is important to keep in mind that the RCMP’s techniques were not specifically Canadian, but were innovated by the FBI’s Counter-intelligence Program (COINTEL PRO) which J. Edgar Hoover launched in 1956 in order to subvert “dangerous civil rights groups” then emerging under the leadership of Paul Robeson and Martin Luther King Jr. From the program’s inception until its nominal death in 1975, not only did the FBI infiltrate every anti-establishment grouping from the U.S. Communist Party (CPUSA), to the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), NAACP to the Black nationalist movements throughout the 1960s, but ensured that its informants played leading roles in instilling internal conflict, radicalized groups towards violence and even set up leaders like Fred Hampton for assassination.
The strange case of Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers who enjoyed vast institutional support and protection after their time running domestic terrorism as leaders of the Weather Underground is something that should also be investigated. The fact that both domestic terrorists not only became affluent Soros-tied education reformers, and early sponsors of Barack Obama’s political career is more than just a tiny anomaly which can simply be dismissed. (1)
Where did Hoover’s FBI generate COINTEL PRO tactics?
To answer this question, we need to look further back to British Intelligence’s Camp X, established in December 1941 in Canada with the mandate to train American and Canadian spies under the control of spymaster William Stephenson (station chief for Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) in New York).
The motive for Camp X had two interconnected components:
1) Prepare the groundwork for a deeper integration of U.S.-British Intelligence in preparation for the purge of patriotic U.S. intelligence officers allied to FDR’s vision of the post-war age, and
2) Train U.S. spies in the art of “secret warfare” which included counterfeiting, psychological warfare, propaganda, counter insurgency, assassination, and infiltration of target groups.
The integration of “full spectrum” alternative warfare tactics such as MK Ultra (modelled and steered by Britain’s earlier Tavis stock clinic), media propaganda (see: Project Mockingbird) and cultural war (see: the rise of modern art and atonalism promoted by the Congress For Cultural Freedom) were but a few of the tactics that were integrated during this process, and which continue virulently to this day.
Under Stephenson’s direction and staffed with Canadian RCMP operatives, the first generation of OSS spymasters were trained; including leading figures of the FBI’s Division 5 who went onto reformulate their WWII Camp X training in the form of assassination operations such as Permindex (operated by Camp X’s Major General Louis Mortimer Bloomfield).
In Conclusion
While I could have said more about the origins of America’s Secret Police which arose under Presidents Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, or the earlier deployment of domestic terrorism by Freemasonic lodges affiliated with Albert Pike (founder of the Ku Klux Klan) in an effort to undo Lincoln’s vision for industrial restoration of the South, these stories will have to be left for another time.
For now, it is enough to state that the “war on terror” set into motion by the World Trade Center attacks of 1993 and 2001, is now expanding to target a broad spectrum of the American population who would be morally resistant to the sorts of anti-human policies demanded by Great Reset Technocrats. This dishonest effort must be exposed and rejected before those actual controllers of terrorism attain their objectives: The destruction of nation states, the imposition of a new ethical paradigm premised on depopulation and entropy.
Footnote
(1) By the late 1970s, the creation of controlled terrorist movements was applied vigorously to the Middle East in the form of Zbigniew Brzezinski’s great idea of channeling money, weapons and other support to radical madrasas across Afghanistan as part of an asymmetrical warfare against the Soviet Union. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, these operations vastly expanded with the help of Saudi intelligence and Mossad involvement on the ground- always coordinated by Anglo American intelligence handlers. Islamic terrorism, just like “domestic American terrorism” always had much less to do with Islam and more to do with political agendas wishing to destroy national governments.
Matthew Ehret is the Editor-in-Chief of the Canadian Patriot Review , Senior Fellow at the American University in Moscow, BRI Expert on Tactical talk, and has authored 3 volumes of ‘Untold History of Canada’ book series. In 2019 he co-founded the Montreal-based Rising Tide Foundation.
Source: Fort Russ News
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Digger’s Purpose
and Standards
This site does not have a particular political position. We
welcome articles from various points of view, and civil debate when differences
arise.
Contributions of articles from posters are always welcome.
Unless a contribution is really beyond the pale, we do not edit what goes up as
topics for discussion. If you would like to contribute an article, let one of
the moderators know. Likewise if you would like to become an official
contributor so you can put up articles yourself, but for that we need to
exchange email addresses and we need a Google email address from you.
Contributions can be anything, including fiction, poems,
cartoons, or songs. They can be your own writing or someone else’s writing
which has yet to be published.
We understand that tempers flare during heated
conversations, and we're willing to overlook the occasional name-calling in
that situation, although we do not encourage it. We also understand that some people enjoy pushing
buttons and that cussing them out may be an understandable response, although
we do not encourage that either. What we
will not tolerate is a pattern of harassment and/or lies about other posters.
Comments
Post a Comment